Hi Jose Thank you for your reply. Yes, we also tested the multi-connection and found it works well. We are very glad to consider other solutions if it is better. In fact, we're considering cases that each event listener has its own instance. In that way, we think we need different connection to identify the listener.(using the "closure") If one connection could also do this, I think we can accept this. Thanks/BR ChenWei -----Original Message----- From: José Bollo [mailto:jose.bollo@xxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 6:54 PM To: I37546 Chin I Cc: josé bollo; Fulup Ar Foll; Loïc Collignon [ IoT.bzh ]; automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; I25461 Momiyama Yoshito Subject: Re: about the connection with afb-deamon 2018-08-10 10:15 GMT+02:00 <I37546_CHIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Jose Hi ChenWei, > I have a question about connection with afb-deamon at APP side. > Is it possible that creating 2 or more connections(for e.g., by afb_ws_client_connect_wsj1()) > with same port/tokenID in one APP(I mean one process)? I have never tried to do that since your question. So I tried and it works. But I guess that you already reached that conclusion. > We have cases that APIs are called for different functions at same time. > I'd like to know if the reply from binder will be sent to the right requester when we do this. Be aware that although opening many sockets works, it is not the prefered way to use libafbwsc. The underlying protocol allows interleaving of queries and responses and the the library already takes care of that feature. Then opening onlmy one socket should be enough even to handle several concurrent requests. Nevertheless, I don't know your exact problem so I can not tell what is the best solution. Anyway both solutions work. Best regards José > > If there are any troubles with this, we will try to keep one connection. > > Thanks/BR > ChenWei > _______________________________________________ automotive-discussions mailing list automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/automotive-discussions