On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 09:48 -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:27 PM Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > In Ubuntu, -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions is a system-wide default and > > > we > > > remove it from the flags when building autofs in d/rules: > > > > > > # Taken from #1636781 as it's the same problem here. Also see > > > # > > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-June/040369.html > > > ifeq ($(shell dpkg-vendor --derives-from Ubuntu && echo yes),yes) > > > export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP = -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions > > > endif > > > > Not sure what #1636781 is? > > Sorry, that's a bug number (not in autofs, but similar): > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1636781 Oh right, another example but not strictly autofs. > > > Would it be useful to provide Ubuntu with patches prior to the > > impending autofs 5.1.7 release (after which these patches would > > be present on kernel.org)? > > > > If so I can certainly do that and if we do then from that point > > any further changes would be done as follow up patches, so they > > would be final upstream patches even though they haven't been > > pushed to the repository yet. > > Sure, and this is the perfect time for that since we are in a new > development cycle. I won't be the one working on it, though, as I > have > been reassigned elsewhere for the next few months. I'll let someone > in > the team know, and I can still file a bug with the patch(es) attached > and let the team work on it. I am struggling to get 5.1.7 out now. The patches will of course be posted to kernel.org when I do get the new release out. But I expect pulling in a new version so soon would be considered premature so what should I do to catch up the the Ubuntu person working on this? Ian
