On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Ian Kent <ikent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 18:52 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: >> On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 11:11 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Ian Kent <ikent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > > I could leave it only for NFS, as it supports it anyway, and not pass it >> > > for any other mounts. Then any bug requests could be passed on the the >> > > file system maintainers. Then I could add it for that file system when >> > > done. >> > > >> > > The only annoyance with that approach is the autofs generic mount >> > > module, which is used to mount a number of file systems, would need to >> > > check the file system name to decide whether to add the sloppy option. >> > > >> > > TBH I'm not to fussy about what we do here but we need to make a >> > > decision before I do or I'll end up flipping back and forth. >> > > >> > > So I guess it's up to us to decide, ;) >> > > >> > > I'll post a message to the autofs list once we decide and see if we get >> > > any good arguments to change the approach and we can alter it as needed >> > > (if at all). >> > >> > Hi Ian, >> > >> > Any news about this? >> > >> > There's more and morecomplaints about the new behavior. I'm inclined >> > to just make it NFS-only, as that will restore the old state of >> > affairs. >> >> Good question, I must admit I had forgotten about it since with the >> report I had the subsystem changed to ignore the option. >> >> I was going to not pass it from autofs and I have a patch for that. >> We could use that, after I check I've cover the bases, and I'll commit >> it upstream with the next set of patches (that might be a little while >> though). > > Leaving it for NFS only, of course. Okay. If you have a patch, please let me know and I'll review and test it. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
