On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Ian Kent <ikent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I could leave it only for NFS, as it supports it anyway, and not pass it > for any other mounts. Then any bug requests could be passed on the the > file system maintainers. Then I could add it for that file system when > done. > > The only annoyance with that approach is the autofs generic mount > module, which is used to mount a number of file systems, would need to > check the file system name to decide whether to add the sloppy option. > > TBH I'm not to fussy about what we do here but we need to make a > decision before I do or I'll end up flipping back and forth. > > So I guess it's up to us to decide, ;) > > I'll post a message to the autofs list once we decide and see if we get > any good arguments to change the approach and we can alter it as needed > (if at all). Hi Ian, Any news about this? There's more and morecomplaints about the new behavior. I'm inclined to just make it NFS-only, as that will restore the old state of affairs. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
