On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 12:24 -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: > Aha! Ok, now this is making sense. The real problem is that the kernel > is not recognizing your two PATA drives at all, therefore, dmraid has no > drives to detect as a raid. > This isn't really related to dmraid, so I am not sure if this is the > correct place to discuss it, but if I were you, I'd unplug the sata > drive and see if you can get the kernel to recognize the pata drives in > some fashion. > :) correct. the PDC20378 can have either SATA drives or PATA drives. My SATA drive is on the ICH5 controller not on the fake raid. I was passed to this list from the RH list and the fedora list ... is there a libata list :) I am configuring the patched 2.6.15rc1 kernel now, I am hoping the patch to the libata driver will do it. I'll keep everyone posted Thanks. > tlc wrote: > > Ok, let me start over, as I said before I posted my full message to this > > list before and only posted a brief problem this time. > > > > Here is a link to the full post .. > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-October/msg02838.html > > notice the misuse of the word to .. it should be two .. sorry > > > > The PDC20378 is a 'fake' raid , so it does have a bios but it is a > > software raid. There are 2 PATA IDE drives attached. > > > > I know very well that I can not RAID a single drive. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list _______________________________________________ Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
