Re: CMD 0649 chipset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'll have a look, I didn't even dive into the code.  I just took the info
site as gospel.
I'll have to have a play tomorrow.

Thanks,
Steve Foster
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Barrington" <rich_b_nz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: CMD 0649 chipset


> I don't know anything specifically, but does CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD64X make
> any difference for that chipset? (a 649 test appears to be in the
> source)
>
> On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 01:03, Steve Foster wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any ideas on how far on the support is for the CMD 0649 chipset with
RAID?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steve Foster.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Mapper]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [Yosemite Campgrounds]     [AMD 64]

  Powered by Linux