Re: CMD 0649 chipset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: CMD 0649 chipset
From: Richard Barrington <rich_b_nz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 01:12:12 +1200
Delivered-to: ataraid-list@listman.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <001201c25a5c$c92a7850$c901a8c0@crbserver.local>
References: <001201c25a5c$c92a7850$c901a8c0@crbserver.local>

I don't know anything specifically, but does CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD64X make
any difference for that chipset? (a 649 test appears to be in the
source)

On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 01:03, Steve Foster wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Any ideas on how far on the support is for the CMD 0649 chipset with RAID?
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve Foster.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CMD 0649 chipset
  - From: Steve Foster

References:
- CMD 0649 chipset
  - From: Steve Foster

Prev by Date: CMD 0649 chipset
Next by Date: Re: CMD 0649 chipset
Previous by thread: CMD 0649 chipset
Next by thread: Re: CMD 0649 chipset
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux Device Mapper] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Kernel] [Linux Books] [Linux Admin] [GFS] [RPM] [Yosemite Campgrounds] [AMD 64]

Powered by Linux