I think there Promise maybe a tiny bit better on my M/B by 33 Mhz... Their IDE buses are UDMA 133, my standard 2 IDE are UDMA 100. In term of real speed, I would like to know how much maybe gain by the extra 33 Mhz. Yoram -----Original Message----- From: ataraid-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ataraid-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jens W. Skov - JS Consult Sent: 18 August 2002 13:52 To: ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: why not use the promise scusi emulation driver ? Next question... why not disable the promise controller and use a std ide controller ? On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 yoram@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > This is EXACTLY where I was coming from so the next question is, doesn't it > make more sense to use Linux Softraid? > > Yoram > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ataraid-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:ataraid-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Arjan van de Ven > Sent: 18 August 2002 13:36 > To: ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: why not use the promise scusi emulation driver ? > > Their RAID is 100% software.... > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list > - Jens W. Skov - JS Consult - Phone: 45884077 / 23254077 - E-Mail: jens@xxxxxxxxxxxx - Web: http://www.jsconsult.dk http://jnet.dk - NEW ADDRESS FROM JULY 02: Rævehøjparken 58, 2800 Lyngby _______________________________________________ Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
