Re: Install Redhat 7.2 with HPT 370

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Warren Togami wrote:

> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:03:17 -1000
> From: Warren Togami <warren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Install Redhat 7.2 with HPT 370
>
[...] 
> > > How do I install redhat 7.2 with HPT 370 IDE RAID on 0?
> > > I am talking about fresh install.
> >
> > Isn't this working just like the installation of redhat 7.1?. There was no
> > problem here installing redhat 7.1 on my HPT 370A RAID 0.
> > Download the drivers from Highpoint, a boot and driver disk.
> 
> Highpoint didn't make their binary only drivers for Red Hat 7.2 yet.
> 
> Their binary only drivers (and also Promise) have been known to not work on
> several onboard controllers and hacked controllers, and you can't upgrade
> your kernel when using their binary only modules.
> 
> 

Please let me quote Arjan first:

> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 05:21:57 -0400
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Misc questions
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 11:17:09AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Vignaud wrote:
> > It's true that the ata cards are not like the scsi one but i though
> > that the hardware could be at least more efficient than the software
> > raid... Is it true only for raid-0 ? Or also for others ?
> > Does the software raid add a cpu overhead that the ataraid don't have ?
> don't let the marketing folks fool you: ataraid IS software raid. Promise
> and highpoint raid is software raid, but with bios boot support.....


So if one is not forced to use HPT BIOS-supported RAID (as far as I heard some
M$ systems require this), why bother with all those binary-only drivers and so
on?

I have installed RHL 7.2 on ABIT BX-133 RAID motherboard (which has HPT370A
on-board), using two 40GB Seagate drives and linux software raid-1 (mirroring)
without any problems, then upgraded kernel and other packages from
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2 and everything is still working fine. (I used LILO
rather than GRUB if I remember correctly, but the only reason was that I was
familiar with LILO and was rather short of time).

Best regards,

Wojtek
--------------------
Wojtek Pilorz
Wojtek.Pilorz@xxxxxx






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Mapper]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [Yosemite Campgrounds]     [AMD 64]

  Powered by Linux