RE: 2.4.12-ac1+Fasttrak 100 raid1 success story (I hope?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David,

Was there an issue with the Fasttrak and the IBM 40s?  The reason I'm asking
is that your statement "based on Promise's promise of cooperation" leads me
to believe that there is a reason that I've experienced the install probs in
the controller not recognizing my IBM 40s.  Or, have I just read in to your
passing remark to mean something that you didn't?  Thanks!

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: David L. Parsley [mailto:parsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 11:27 PM
To: ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 2.4.12-ac1+Fasttrak 100 raid1 success story (I hope?)


Today I got my new Fasttrak (based on Promise's promise of cooperation) 
and 2 IBM 40Giggers.  I set up mirroring, and installed 7.1 w/ the 
Promise supplied drivers.

Naturally, I was in a pretty big hurry to get something a bit more 
modern than 2.4.2, and having heard ac kernels include Fasttrak support, 
I grabbed 2.4.12-ac1.  The good news is, it _appears_ to work just fine. 
  Thanks to e2label, I only had to modify the swap line in the fstab, 
and now the system is up and running.  This makes me Very Happy. (tm)

However, based on my browsing the mailing list archives and what 
documentation there is, I'm a little worried - am I playing with fire 
here? ;-)  Raid-1 support sounds like it's sketchy at best...

What I'd _like_ to hear is 'hey, if you've gotten that far you're in 
great shape'.  Otherwise, I'll just report back in a few weeks with 
'still works for me' or whatever.

regards,
	David



_______________________________________________

Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Mapper]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel]     [Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [Yosemite Campgrounds]     [AMD 64]

  Powered by Linux