I get the desired use case to run app_amd from within a Stasis application, but I’m not sure about app_queue. You have everything at your disposal within ARI itself to replicate all of the functionality of app_queue and beyond.
On April 2, 2019 at 7:18:31 PM, Sungtae Kim (pchero21@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
Um... Because... I can?
Tbh, no reason... app_queue is just my favorite module. :P
On 4/2/19 11:41 PM, Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, at 6:20 PM, Sungtae Kim wrote:
>> Hi Asterisk users,
>>
>> I'm one of Asterisk ARI users, and trying to designing the new ARI for
>> application execution in Stasis().
>>
>> This will be made possible for executing the applications in the
>> Stasis() application.
>>
>> But, before going further, I would like to know which application needs
>> to be considered.
>>
>> Because this feature will introduce new Stasis behavior, I would like to
>> test the applications as many as possible before submitting the code.
>> However, I can't test all of them, so I would like to make a priority
>> and list.
>>
>> If you want to use your favorite application with this feature, please
>> reply this.
>> I will add to the list. :)
>>
>> Btw, I'm considering the app_amd, app_queue for myself. :)
> Can you explain why app_queue would be executed from ARI? What value does ARI bring in that regard?
>
_______________________________________________
asterisk-app-dev mailing list
asterisk-app-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.digium.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-app-dev
_______________________________________________ asterisk-app-dev mailing list asterisk-app-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.digium.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-app-dev
