Re: ARI application execution feature survey

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Um... Because... I can?
Tbh, no reason... app_queue is just my favorite module. :P

On 4/2/19 11:41 PM, Joshua C. Colp wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, at 6:20 PM, Sungtae Kim wrote:
Hi Asterisk users,

I'm one of Asterisk ARI users, and trying to designing the new ARI for
application execution in Stasis().

This will be made possible for executing the applications in the
Stasis() application.

But, before going further, I would like to know which application needs
to be considered.

Because this feature will introduce new Stasis behavior, I would like to
test the applications as many as possible before submitting the code.
However, I can't test all of them, so I would like to make a priority
and list.

If you want to use your favorite application with this feature, please
reply this.
I will add to the list. :)

Btw, I'm considering the app_amd, app_queue for myself. :)
Can you explain why app_queue would be executed from ARI? What value does ARI bring in that regard?


_______________________________________________
asterisk-app-dev mailing list
asterisk-app-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.digium.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-app-dev




[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk SS7]     [Asterisk Announcements]     [Asterisk Users]     [PJ SIP]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux