Re: ARI application execution feature survey

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, at 6:20 PM, Sungtae Kim wrote:
> Hi Asterisk users,
> 
> I'm one of Asterisk ARI users, and trying to designing the new ARI for 
> application execution in Stasis().
> 
> This will be made possible for executing the applications in the 
> Stasis() application.
> 
> But, before going further, I would like to know which application needs 
> to be considered.
> 
> Because this feature will introduce new Stasis behavior, I would like to 
> test the applications as many as possible before submitting the code.
> However, I can't test all of them, so I would like to make a priority 
> and list.
> 
> If you want to use your favorite application with this feature, please 
> reply this.
> I will add to the list. :)
> 
> Btw, I'm considering the app_amd, app_queue for myself. :)

Can you explain why app_queue would be executed from ARI? What value does ARI bring in that regard?

-- 
Joshua C. Colp
Digium - A Sangoma Company | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org

_______________________________________________
asterisk-app-dev mailing list
asterisk-app-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.digium.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-app-dev




[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk SS7]     [Asterisk Announcements]     [Asterisk Users]     [PJ SIP]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux