On 21/10/13 09:16, Joshua Colp wrote: > Alistair Cunningham wrote: >> On 21/10/13 01:15, Paul Belanger wrote: >>> So I am starting to work with ARI events and notice our naming >>> conventions are not consistent. I wanted to have a discussion about >>> maybe coming up with an ideal suffix and stick with it. >> >> While we're on the topic, I seem to remember seeing at AstriDevCon that >> the normal call life cycle generated events like ChannelCreated, Answer, >> BridgeDestroyed, and Hangup. These strike me as somewhat inconsistent >> names. Why Hangup rather than ChannelDestroyed? > > There's actually separate events for hangup and destruction. ^_^ Fair enough. As long as it's consistent. -- Alistair Cunningham +1 888 468 3111 +44 20 799 39 799 http://integrics.com/
