Re: Proposal about AUR affairs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 2023-12-11 at 13:29 +0000, Polarian wrote:
> > 5. Currently,to evaluate whether a AUR package is eligible to move in
> > Arch Linux official packages (extra repo), It only depend on votes
> > and popularity and whether there is a maintainer willing to pick it
> > up. However, those factors is too lack of details. To evaluate the
> > robustness of the eco-position of a package, It should evaulate the
> > discussion, issue report, contribution, and ... And it should be
> > evaluated case by case.
> 
> This is not an easy thing to address, boolean logic doesn't work here,
> do you want an AI to run over a PKGBUILD and try to guess how good it
> is?

A Stopover could be an unofficial repo made from auto-build AUR
packages:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/unofficial_user_repositories#chaotic-aur

This also helps to avoid packaging binaries vs build from source code a
little bit.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux