Re: Proposal about AUR affairs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



El dom, 10-12-2023 a las 12:03 +0100, Jelle van der Waa escribió:
> I understand the demand for having a proper issue tracker and proper 
> merge requests.

That's the point.

What the AUR really lacks is precisely this. A complete system of merge
requests and issues, so that the packages are really projects in which
anyone can collaborate at any given time.

You could bring the AUR into your own GitLab instance, but it would
require some development to make it work as an AUR. Another option
would be to do the same but instead of using a full instance, create an
AUR group in the current GitLab, but this would require the
aforementioned development and would need something to handle
permissions so that users cannot modify each other's repositories.

Implementing other solutions would be, IMHO, too much of a stretch when
with GitLab you have practically everything done.  However, the
customization layer that you have to put on top of it to make it work
as an AUR is not going to be easy to do.

Greetings.

-- 
Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux