Re: PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2021-02-22 13:58:36, Anton Hvornum via arch-general wrote:
That would answer my issue yesterday, but raises another question.

What dictates if something is worthy of being put on the bulletin
board on the main website?

I added 2FA way back when to /etc/pam.d/system-login and that meant
that pacman placed a .pacnew file alongside the modified system-login
(as expected) on upgrade.
But the notification about this got lost in the sea of packages which
is on me of course. But seeing as this is a modification to a system
critical file can (and did) cause a complete lockout of accounts on
the machine due to `auth    required` being the keywords put in place.
I would have expected this to be on the bulletin board about possible
manual intervention required.

These days I don't pacman -Syu, I have a script that:

- checks the news
- runs -Syu
- runs pacdiff

It's saved me a lot of hassle, but doesn't catch everything.

For me, I would use an option that allowed pacman to 'pause' on messages (like post install stuff) to give me time to read them.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux