Re: PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?
From: Doug Newgard via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 07:10:11 -0600
Cc: Doug Newgard <scimmia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAG2iS6oY70sby9O8Ok3oApYg7=AqfoeSZfYXWGgC4_aJoJxuBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:36 +0100
Anton Hvornum via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What dictates if something is worthy of being put on the bulletin
> board on the main website?

Something out of the ordinary. Merging .pacnew files is a normal, standard part
of system updates.

References:
- PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?
  - From: Anton Hvornum via arch-general
- Re: PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?
  - From: Björn Fries via arch-general
- Re: PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?
  - From: Anton Hvornum via arch-general

Prev by Date: Re: PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?
Next by Date: Re: PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?
Previous by thread: Re: PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?
Next by thread: Re: PAM 1.3.1 -> 1.5.1 did pam_tally get removed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux