On 10/11/19 6:10 PM, Daniel Moch via arch-general wrote: > I see in the archive[1] that these were deleted for not following the > submission guidelines[2]. I'm not sure how that's the case, unless the > logic is that since they merely bundle packages in Community that they > violate rule #1? > > If that's the logic, does that mean any meta packages in the AUR violate > the submission guidelines? > > Can someone clarify? I'm genuinely a little confused here ... > > [1] - https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2019-October/034288.html > [2] - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines Metapackages are a tough question, but in this case a metapackage to ease installation which requires one to use the AUR to get the metapackage seems to be quite pointless. Besides which, uploading a package as a reactive measure due to the lack of clarity with the former base group feels odd when people are working behind the scenes to try to figure out what a proper solution in the right place should look like. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
