Re: `base` group replaced by mandatory `base`, package - manual intervention required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:15:42PM +0200, Robin Broda via arch-general wrote:
> You've got the explanation in the mail that informed you about the removal automatically :)

I see in the archive[1] that these were deleted for not following the
submission guidelines[2]. I'm not sure how that's the case, unless the
logic is that since they merely bundle packages in Community that they
violate rule #1?

If that's the logic, does that mean any meta packages in the AUR violate
the submission guidelines?

Can someone clarify? I'm genuinely a little confused here ...

[1] - https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2019-October/034288.html
[2] - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines

-- 
Daniel Moch
daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://djmoch.org



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux