Re: `base` group replaced by mandatory `base`, package - manual intervention required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Thank you. It would be wonderful to be given reasons why. That would help
me contribute in a more acceptable way moving forward, which is ultimately
my personal goal.

As such, time can be made to contribute, but time can't be given to explain
why a moderative action was taken and how best to proceed in the future.

So again, thank you.


On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 8:28 PM Giancarlo Razzolini <grazzolini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Em outubro 10, 2019 17:06 John Crist via arch-general escreveu:
> > I've submitted `base-extras` to the AUR at
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/base-extras/ that contains the
> > missing packages from `base` if someone REALLY wants it.
> >
> >
> >
>
> And I have removed it. Following the same criteria, I've also removed
> base-devel-meta.
>
> Regards,
> Giancarlo Razzolini



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux