Re: AppArmor support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 9/27/18 8:28 PM, Michal Soltys wrote:
> That's not precisely like that - spectre & friends workarounds can be
> trivially disabled (e.g.: pti, spectre_v2, spec_store_bypass_disable,
> l1tf) - bringing "old" nominal performance back (whether good/bad idea,
> that of course depends on what/how you run your linux on for what
> purpose). Not mentioning cpus that will eventually come not needing
> those workarounds.
> 
> So in this context audit=0 is a very viable thing - if one (and that's
> probalby crushing majority of users) doesn't need this feature (directly
> or indirectly).

Even if you disable the mitigations, the fast path we're talking about
here was simply deleted from linux.git -- it doesn't exist anymore,
zero, zilch, squat, nada.

-- 
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux