AppArmor support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 13:42, Gus <qty@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I know such request was rejected here
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/59733
> recently, but still AppArmor doesn't need linking with libraries and
> doesn't
> require as much userland support as SELinux, so it will not hurt to have
> one
> option enabled in kernel, right?

You have been rejected by heftig and tpowa. It is unclear why and what you are asking here.
Suppose AppArmour does not require linking. So what?

Btw, you hided the information - this issue was reopened and closed again, so it was reconsidered and was closed twice.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux