Re: AppArmor support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



You have been rejected by heftig and tpowa. It is unclear why and what
you are asking here.
It was accepted first and then rejected by heftig.

Suppose AppArmour does not require linking. So what?
As heftig wrote, that was main reason for rejecting SELinux and AppArmor
support, but since it doesn't apply to AppArmor i see no reason to reject it.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux