Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
From: Maxwell Anselm via arch-general <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 23:37:09 -0500
Cc: Maxwell Anselm <silverhammermba@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <2a33c65a-2251-60e4-f772-aec94f468e03@web.de>
Reply-to: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> You mean the source files that you downloaded and then hashed...
>

Yes. If the source files are being modified via a MITM attack (which is
trivial if the host uses HTTP) the checksum is still useful.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: David C. Rankin
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: sivmu

References:
- Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: fnodeuser
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: sivmu
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: Maxwell Anselm via arch-general
- Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
  - From: sivmu

Prev by Date: Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
Next by Date: Re: After upgrade
Previous by thread: Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
Next by thread: Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux