Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




Am 03.12.2016 um 20:07 schrieb Maxwell Anselm via arch-general:
>>
>> I agree that we should use a strong hash by default where it makes
>> sense. But in the absense ob effective validation of upstream packages,
>> this is meaningless.
>>
> 
> It would at least indicate that the source file has been tampered with in
> some way. Even though there would be no way to know the "correct" checksum.
> 

You mean the source files that you downloaded and then hashed...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux