Re: Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



>
> I agree that we should use a strong hash by default where it makes
> sense. But in the absense ob effective validation of upstream packages,
> this is meaningless.
>

It would at least indicate that the source file has been tampered with in
some way. Even though there would be no way to know the "correct" checksum.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux