Re: snapcraft.io IMO gets across the message that snaps are appropriate for Arch Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 01:00:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>There even is something bad with Mr. Grawert. It's very simple, some  
            is _not_

pardon a typo, I missed the "not"

Serious Eli, it's just you who is spreading nonsense at the moment. By
reading something, unrelated to this Arch thread, out of context of an
Ubuntu thread.

>developers are in favour of snappy others plan to stay with normal
>repositories, shared libraries, the non-container approach. I
>several times explained that I corrected wrong statements



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux