Re: snapcraft.io IMO gets across the message that snaps are appropriate for Arch Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:13:30 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>You are using Ubuntu resources to spread an anti-snapcraft message
>along the lines of Arch-style philosophy.

That is off-top for this list and apart from this untrue.

I'm a part of the Ubuntu community. For your very information, Ubuntu
for servers and desktop computers is based upon apt, not snaps. Some
issues can't be solved by using snaps, this is the wrong approach for
Ubuntu, too. However, this is OT for this list. Please don't claim that
I misused their list, this is untrue. I corrected wrong statements in
this and several other threads. Wrong statements that usually are
completely unrelated to Arch Linux.

>The Arch devs already know, and expressed their complete unconcern in
>every aspect of that website and the community surrounding it.
>We discovered that the last time someone spawned a mega-thread in this
>mailing list. I'm sure you saw it...

IIRC there wasn't a thread about snappy, but about a similar approach.
However, I didn't notice concerns about misleading usage of the Arch
logo on the Ubuntu website, but I might not have read the complete
thread.

Regards,
Ralf



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux