On Sun, 2016-08-14 at 15:27 -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > I would argue it is not the raw number or percentage of packages that > are out of date, but *which* packages are out of date. For example, > I > wouldn't place equal weight on pychess as I would glibc. Agree with this completely - some packages in core are more 'tier 1' ... others. We should focus on the more important ones - of which there a small number based on my quick scan. We are a volunteer org and overall things are PDG (pretty damn good) :-) - and we are all very grateful for the time put in by those who are helping making Arch a premier distro. Thank you! gene -- Gene lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx
