Re: very out of date packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Ido Rosen <ido@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general <
> arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> refind-efi has been flagged out of date for 9 months.
>> Are there any packagers who would be willing to take this one over?
>>
>> It is not the most out of date even  ... but it's an important
>> component for those who boot with it. There are plenty of others which
>> are also very out of date.
>>
>> I counted over 220 packages marked out of date. Of those nearly 20 were
>> flagged in 2015 or earlier.
>>
>> Some of them have newer versions in AUR; but it would be good to try
>> get at least some of these updated.
>>
>> What's the best way to tackle this issue?
>>
>
> Maybe recruit more TUs, have more TUs overlap in coverage areas (i.e.
> encourage co-maintainership/co-packagers/teamwork/more than one
> maintainer per package), and accept TUs that manage fewer packages at a
> time (to reduce time commitment required per TU).
>

Although, it's worth noting, 220/14800 (<2%) of out of date packages at any
given time (and <0.2% badly out of date) isn't that bad...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux