On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 03:19:29PM -0400, Ido Rosen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Ido Rosen <ido@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Although, it's worth noting, 220/14800 (<2%) of out of date packages at any > given time (and <0.2% badly out of date) isn't that bad... I would argue it is not the raw number or percentage of packages that are out of date, but *which* packages are out of date. For example, I wouldn't place equal weight on pychess as I would glibc.
