On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Rob Miller <docrobot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote: >>> > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller <docrobot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > >>> > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote: >>> > > > Any reasons? >>> > > >>> > > Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the >>> > > name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux >>> > > project. Just thought this might bear mentioning. >>> > > >>> > >>> > Just a heads up, I am and have been interested in bringing retroarch into >>> > [community] and have had nightly builds going around for a while. >>> Hopefully >>> > I'll have the time to do so in a not so distant future. >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > -- >>> > Maxime >>> >>> Is it only a matter of time, or are there other things in the way? >>> Anything that people can help with? >>> >> >> Time only, the build issues I had when I first got into it were fixed in >> the 1.3 release. >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Maxime > > Hi Maxime, > > Just noticed that RetroArch landed in community, thanks for doing this. :) > > Diego Can someone please help me check the wiki reflects the new package in community? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/RetroArch I've already made a small change to reflect to the new package in community, but I don't know if more changes are needed. Thanks, Diego
