On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Rob Miller <docrobot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote: >> > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller <docrobot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote: >> > > > Any reasons? >> > > >> > > Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the >> > > name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux >> > > project. Just thought this might bear mentioning. >> > > >> > >> > Just a heads up, I am and have been interested in bringing retroarch into >> > [community] and have had nightly builds going around for a while. >> Hopefully >> > I'll have the time to do so in a not so distant future. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > -- >> > Maxime >> >> Is it only a matter of time, or are there other things in the way? >> Anything that people can help with? >> > > Time only, the build issues I had when I first got into it were fixed in > the 1.3 release. > > Cheers, > -- > Maxime Hi Maxime, Just noticed that RetroArch landed in community, thanks for doing this. :) Diego
