On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Rob Miller <docrobot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller <docrobot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote: > > > > Any reasons? > > > > > > Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the > > > name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux > > > project. Just thought this might bear mentioning. > > > > > > > Just a heads up, I am and have been interested in bringing retroarch into > > [community] and have had nightly builds going around for a while. > Hopefully > > I'll have the time to do so in a not so distant future. > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Maxime > > Is it only a matter of time, or are there other things in the way? > Anything that people can help with? > Time only, the build issues I had when I first got into it were fixed in the 1.3 release. Cheers, -- Maxime
