On 13/05/15 03:15 AM, Daniel Micay wrote: > On 13/05/15 02:52 AM, Doug Newgard wrote: >> On Wed, 13 May 2015 02:27:14 -0400 >> Daniel Micay <danielmicay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> The base and base-devel groups are installed in the containers used for >>> building, so it's quite sane to assume they're present as build deps. >> >> That hasn't been true for a while now. Build roots, by default, only include >> base-devel. > > Oh right. Packages can't really get away with implicit deps on base in > many cases then. It'll break if they try to link against a library or if > they actually have a check() function running a test suite. I think it > can be considered a bug if running the program in check() doesn't work. The unsaid rule is really "packages can have implicit runtime dependencies on packages that are in both the base and base-devel groups".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
