Re: Why irrelevant updates?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Francis Gerund <ranrund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Okay guys, thanks for the info.
>
> I didn't know about and hadn't thought about all the packages in the base
> group being mandatory (or at least "expected" by other packages).
>
>
> And yes, I find installed automatically, packages for:
> -ext
> -jfs
> -reiser
> -xfs
> and who knows what else . . .
>
> Even though I also am only using ext4 (and a swap partition).
>

Yes, and those aren't the only things installed in the base group that
aren't really necessary.
-nano
-vi
-mdadm
-lvm2
-cryptsetup
-s-nail
-dhcpcd
-netctl
-licenses

It is what it is. FWIW -- I don't think they are "expected", base is a
guideline and other packages should not be making assumptions (and usually
don't).

I think it could reasonably be expected that one has things like
bash/sed/tar installed, but anything likely to be manually removed from
base I expect to be listed in package dependencies.

-- Eli Schwartz


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux