Re: Why irrelevant updates?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 13/05/15 02:52 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015 02:27:14 -0400
> Daniel Micay <danielmicay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> The base and base-devel groups are installed in the containers used for
>> building, so it's quite sane to assume they're present as build deps.
> 
> That hasn't been true for a while now. Build roots, by default, only include
> base-devel.

Oh right. Packages can't really get away with implicit deps on base in
many cases then. It'll break if they try to link against a library or if
they actually have a check() function running a test suite. I think it
can be considered a bug if running the program in check() doesn't work.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux