-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/13/2013 01:03 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > > Not reading pacman's output may lead to problems. Why do you think > it's a bad way? > It's precisely because I *did* read pacman's output that I was alarmed. Like I say, I think it's okay. But I'd like to keep better abreast of changes--and especially the thinking that goes into them--so I understand the pacman output when I see it. - -- David Benfell / benfell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please see https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 for GnuPG information (or the attachment you don't understand) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRkLADAAoJELJhbl/uPb4SnCQP+wU03UatdwyQlfs/wA/FTcz/ yz9iYVqtfb0lpkEBODO2GqW3fsu+MEYemic1dcS53xtxVdOOSMc3j2aiIU1MOw+d cvdUXJvFVv/wT4//8+msqx4zMKWTK1vU+ufWVW8JKJMxT445NjFC7Tacjzkxz6zH QHJm1cOH/MWzyBSBJ9ui/BNj+4Sbbivv0IzKuJcxw/CDJjMMMmUB+yd8Op1MP4bv ktpV/aLRHcoD5MEp2IA/JirHin759W9+84cDu60kMMJJD/pY6wZBJzwXjtwemOLl +6AcLtt1uvVeUvbo4jP9QUYm7jUw5ZGck1VjChBuVQrysZaHBWxBelXpxL1lnHPX 0QZDvwmC/tqwCAYCxKr9fOLWvZr90eC8ioOfo+NWWhQR9o2AaxJTzQ0Ef6iHOG8B 0QovcIu9lCLLIcviipdhYTmrxXxmt5B8bZrmQTSLBbv9T94PjBRE6qHigN8TskiZ e1yMUw7qzWaq/vFzQlfNQRju7KbOcITeCRYK3uwuFp9LLlnC5S2JWWU2Ahj26ont 9aprGVlS0EB13cE8mZdCYBp/ea1VYwmYHQtc9nqx/8noyMDrHx51DzyGT9SIE3oR JKNz7deSzwUsqk/nxbuxQwl0OaQvM3qwXM5VxejE0L2teAq2w48Fv+ilLW4PMjuN OfhHKp1ouvtFsjftarZ4 =ohCh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
