On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:32 AM, David Benfell <benfell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was alarmed, I think unnecessarily, when I saw the message that a > symlink for systemd was removed on an upgrade. > > As near as I can tell, the boot sequence still relies on init, which > links to the right place. > > Is there a better way to keep track of changes like this so I'm not > surprised? > > Thanks! Not reading pacman's output may lead to problems. Why do you think it's a bad way?
