-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/13/2013 12:26 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > On Sunday 12 May 2013 22:32:03 David Benfell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I was alarmed, I think unnecessarily, when I saw the message that >> a symlink for systemd was removed on an upgrade. >> >> As near as I can tell, the boot sequence still relies on init, >> which links to the right place. >> >> Is there a better way to keep track of changes like this so I'm >> not surprised? >> >> Thanks! -- David Benfell / benfell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please see >> https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 for GnuPG information (or the >> attachment you don't understand) > > There was a post installation message. > Yes, if I take your message correctly, that was the message that alarmed me. Since systemd is the new init, I wanted to be sure that booting would still work correctly. I haven't tried, but I'm guessing it will. I'm just wanting to be kept better abreast. Thanks! - -- David Benfell / benfell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please see https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 for GnuPG information (or the attachment you don't understand) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRkK90AAoJELJhbl/uPb4SBdYP/RFqJenOCPb69GConmp3iTzm wcB/W0LXb85or24mnN6IlwmAiIva+QOn1pDok3NtUStWNuDGvcBDvFn544it1ePL SLgvDVqxQiaBKR+UsKbgM1ikLtwZVjx0m50D+20ckI/HHfjbnFbXjXIE01dvvBBL c+AhGQyx2Yn9C2Bv0S8Q/xI9R9oaGPxc9MUPrmQT6OIwtIdzjF+4uEgB5r+BDJMS HlyoqMQ0wJbau0NhNzwsxtiffXQq0sEIVwUyTdaDlsQW9Ge7lkX7VnMCchT2+bsY l/W7WWcOPUR+PdVctkFypj5Fpe6xkGEaSi3KOAN3sOX77+mHL81LSPtDipSgllOT nyaoJI9CWsf/zy1SkeVuybnIH+3ew636vR4zqR+2JpJxxlNWz1HqK7TdzyO8fEB8 /SaiU7mhaqznMdj9a2BlHr46gB41zoC3ZVQOSZhVoW6PSFCvQd2wJrd0VHmf1nTP k0FPIfNMi+UuhTgx9llXbN5yKy9nHU5PIV5aco1NBt11nn+C4dO0UKbFrsJW33Gy RPCohXukyWPWevrbjr1jp2QGN/yBQhqok+IKAZtS0/aA2VpMHkIsaHR5mcotYu8j pLdT+IgWOGje4xT8FhlvR7JC1AfuVIfyt1Paw9FIelnJXXuOawqhu61tinovd/yO TetC/wErACT1HPgYSC8K =aued -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
