Re: libsystemd to systemd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



> People are grumbling about this compatibility layer, and I might
> change/remove it at some point. The reason I still have not ripped it
> out is that I like the fact that your system will "just work" as
> before if you add init=/bin/systemd to the kernel command line.
> Without the compatibility layer you'd have to also enable the relevant
> services (I guess that's not too much to ask though...).
>

I think it's asking more than commenting out the DAEMONS line?


> > I assumed they were used a little, if they are unused why are they
> > required, dependencies?  
> 
> Not entirely sure what you are asking. systemd-tools used to be a
> dependency of initscripts (it is used all over the place), now
> systemd-tools was merged into systemd, so systemd is a dependency of
> initscripts. Does that answer your question?


Thanks yeah, rc.sysinit explains the rest

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________

'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a
universal interface'

(Doug McIlroy)
_______________________________________________________________________


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux