Re: SystemD poll

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 22.08.2012 02:48, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 22.08.2012 02:10, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Patrick Murphy <thegerdur@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Could you give me a brief explanation as to why init scripts are better?
I'm newish to Unix style operating systems
As I said; they are tried-and-true since *decades*, all the problems
have been ironed out by slow small changes, so if somebody has
problems they are probably hitting very few people.

Switching to systemd is not a small change, it's a revolutionary
change, with the potential to break many people's boot (it has broken
things in Fedora, and openSUSE, and it's happening in Arch Linux as
well). So, a sensible person would wait until a sensible time to make
the big switch (which is clearly not now).

Arch is not sensible in the conservative sense. Being conservative here
means waiting for others to make the software more stable. This is not
really what Arch is about. We regularly move to software that is
just-about-enough stable to be used. As far as I am concerned, systemd is at
that point since I was able to convert my laptop to it without any problems
at all.
So if it works for you, it will surely work for *everybody* else. I
have seen this argument so many times that I'm starting to worry about
the rationality of Arch Linux users and developers.

I said "As far as I am concerned, systemd is at that point since I was able to convert my laptop to it without any problems at all." You say I somehow said something along the lines of "As far as I am concerned, systemd is at that point since I was able to convert my laptop to it without any problems at all so it will surely work for *everybody* else."

I suppose you are mostly trolling at this point anyway but at least don't make it so obvious!


Yes, it's good to be on the bleeding edge, but there's a difference
between using the latest and greatest Linux kernel (stable one),
glibc, gcc, or even python. But systemd is an entirely different
beast, but apparently you are simply unable to understand how
different it is.

Go ahead make it the default, and if people start hitting problems
(everything points they will, and they will be *bad*), you would have
such massive complains that the recent discussions in arch-general
would seem mild in comparison.

Well, we have a bug tracker for that. Go ahead and report some bugs.


Nobody likes to have their system totally broken with no easy solution
in sight for no reason.

Cheers.


Obviously not.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux