On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Rémy Oudompheng <remyoudompheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2012/8/15 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Am 15.08.2012 13:34, schrieb Felipe Contreras: >>>>>> 1./ Be a small simple binary >>>>> >>>>> The systemd main binary is not very large (larger than sysvinit's >>>>> /sbin/init, but not by much). >>>> >>>> But that binary alone is useless, and certainly not *simple*. >>> >>> /sbin/init from sysvinit alone is useless. What is your point? >> >> The rest are rather simple scripts (in the case of Arch Linux). >> >> And you are still ignoring the fact that systemd is anything but >> *simple*. How convenient to ignore that argument. > > Here are my two cents about that: > * I don't care about having a faster boot if the sequence is incorrect > or buggy (or, worse, leaves me with an unbootable system) > * I don't care about having a simpler boot if it doesn't work > * I don't care about systemd or bash scripts as long as it is > maintained and bug-fixed. Well, systemd is known to cause problems that render the system unbootable: https://www.google.com/search?q=systemd+unbootable -- Felipe Contreras
