On 08/10/2012 08:03 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote: [putolin]
Look, you don't _have_ to use pacman to manage software. As I said elsewhere, dependencies on pulse, lirc, etc. are there for a reason. If you disagree with this reason, file a bugreport. But using dummy packages is just cheating.
Then how does one install arch? pacman is very convenient Isn't pacman the only package manager for arch? I did not understand that arch had many options for package managers.
