On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:15:32 +0200 "Ralf Mardorf" <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:56:33 +0200, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Heiko Baums <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> /usr/lib/systemd/system > > > > Why don't you just delete the things you don't want? > > When not using systemd, is it ok to delete /usr/lib/systemd completely? > Is it ok to replace libsystemd (or what ever is installed by dependencies) > with a dummy-package? I'm not booted to Arch yet, so I don't know what > exactly is installed. > > IMO dummy-packages are the best choice, if possible. > > E.g. regarding to pulseaudio the package > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48718 isn't maintained anymore. > I never used it, but directly build a pulseaudio dummy package, but IIRC > libpulse still must be installed. Why should somebody maintain a package, > when dummy packages does the same job? > > However, it's not that easy to know what is and what isn't needed. Look, you don't _have_ to use pacman to manage software. As I said elsewhere, dependencies on pulse, lirc, etc. are there for a reason. If you disagree with this reason, file a bugreport. But using dummy packages is just cheating. > > Regards, > Ralf > > > -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
