On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Karol Babioch <karol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 29.07.2012 07:59, schrieb C Anthony Risinger: >> the link isn't broken, right? pointing to, say, /lib/systemd/... > > No, its not: > > [root@vpcs ~]# ls -l > /etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/getty@tty1.service > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jul 29 01:12 > /etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/getty@tty1.service -> > /usr/lib/systemd/getty@.service do you have `ls --color` enabled? that link is almost certainly broken: # ls /usr/lib/systemd/getty@.service ls: cannot access /usr/lib/systemd/getty@.service: No such file or # ls /usr/lib/systemd/system/getty@.service /usr/lib/systemd/system/getty@.service ... note the extra `system` in the path. do a: # systemctl reenable getty@tty1.service ... it looks like you probably tried to manually relink it at some point. > By the way: When starting it manually my X server gets killed and I get > switched back to tty1. So the unit file should be fine. that is really odd ... AFAIK they should not conflict with each other at all ... i've no idea whats happening there. the only real difference i see between your setup and min is the use of: display-manager.service -> /usr/lib/systemd/system/gdm.service ... whereas i simply put gdm in graphical.target.wants: graphical.target.wants/gdm.service -> /usr/lib/systemd/system/gdm.service ... i don't think that's really an issue tho. systemd.special seems to suggest that this special unit is mainly for LSB compatibility, but it's not clear. -- C Anthony
