> > One cannot have a console on /dev/tty0, sine it's not a real tty but > > only a pointer to the currently activated console. > > Ok, maybe the terminology I've used is wrong. However I'm talking about > the console, which normally would come up when pressing "Ctrl+Alt+F1". > Guess it would be tty1 then ;). Looks like so on linux but you can certainly be excused for picking it up from somewhere. On OpenBSD you have a /dev/console (I guess like tty0 on linux) and tty0 comes up from ctrl-alt-f1. You also have OpenBSD 5.0 releases Linux kernels start with 3.2.1 not 3.2.0 The Human vs computer friendly argument, I guess. p.s. I noticed this the other day but figured I had said and repeated enough about systemd but as ttys have come up I will mention it. "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Init"; "Aside from runlevels 0, 1, and 6, every Unix and Unix-like system treats runlevels a little differently. The common denominator is the /etc/inittab file, which defines what each runlevel does (if they do anything at all)." So it seems systemd has achieved the opposite (maybe for a good reason, I do not know) on one of it's goals and I would say the main driving force behind it of unifying init system control in this case at the very least. -- _______________________________________________________________________ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface' (Doug McIlroy) _______________________________________________________________________
