Re: Roadmap for user-intervention upgrades [was: Still Glibc problems]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Manolo Martínez
<manolo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/20/12 at 09:31pm, Florian Pritz wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez <manolo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
>> > > All of those changes were discussed by the devs on arch-dev-public
>> >
>> > I, for one, thought that running archlinux responsibly only committed me
>> > to subscribing to and reading arch-announce and -general. If I need to
>> > read -dev-public too I will, but it'd be good to be explicit about this.
>>
>> You don't have to read arch-dev-public if you just want to use Arch, but
>> your original question was about the reasoning behind the move and that
>> information is available in the mailing list archives.
>
> No, apparently you do need to know why and how these things are done even if you just
> want to use Arch and don't plan to develop for it. That's a lesson I learnt around here anyway.
>
> Manolo

Just to chime in here, I hadn't updated my system in about 6 months
and was able to get past the /lib bump without reading the ML threads
just fine. The news article linking to the wiki page was plenty.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux