Re: Roadmap for user-intervention upgrades [was: Still Glibc problems]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> All of those changes were discussed by the devs on arch-dev-public
> 
> filesystem ->
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-June/023014.html
> 
> grub ->
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-June/023147.html
> 
> /lib -> usr/lib ->
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-March/022625.html
> 
> There are also discussions there about what will happen and when stuff
> breaks like the pacman bug when usr lib was in testing, most of that
> happens that

I, for one, thought that running archlinux responsibly only committed me
to subscribing to and reading arch-announce and -general. If I need to
read -dev-public too I will, but it'd be good to be explicit about this. 

In my previous e-mail I also raised the point of having a roadmap for upgrades
that require user intervention. I'd like to know if that'd be 
feasible; I think it would be useful.

Manolo
-- 


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux